In the typical scenario, the, um, victim has his or her arm extended, and the practitioner presses down on the arm. The patient is then handed a sealed container of (or less often, made to sniff) a substance which he or she should be allergic to, and the downward press of the arm is repeated. If the patient is allergic to the substance, and then he or she is usually less able to resist the downward pressure by the practitioner.
However, if the practitioner changes his pressure or point of contact on the arm, then the victim will experience similar changes in ability to resist. This is due to the simple physics of leverage. The further from the body the person presses, the harder it will be for the victim to resist.
I say purports and victim because, _TO_ME_, this does not always appear to be completely on the level. There _IS_ something to kinesiology; BUT there is also a lot of fraud and self deception in the field. My doctor spoke to a practitioner of kinesiology who told him to simply press harder when the patient, or should it be victim, was holding something containing sugar or other allergens he felt the patient should not eat. (As a result, Doc has rejected the whole concept of kinesiology as impractical. I think unfairly so, but he always seeks objective proof.)
I have both seen and experienced chiropractors employing this
method of pressing harder or moving the contact point so as to vary the
subject's ability to resist. In most cases, the practitioner was not
consciously aware that he was pressing further out on the arm when he
wanted the arm to go down, and closer when he wanted the arm to stay up.
He was an excellent practitioner of chiropractic, and my guess was that
he subconsciously knew what he wanted to do, using this only as a method
of letting his subconscious talk to his conscious.
And then there was the female chiropractor / kinesiologist who seemed
to be trying (subconsciously?) to manipulate my reactions by how much
cleavage she bared in my face... I kid you not! The more she expected a
reaction and didn't get it -- the more frustrated or puzzled she seemed --
the more she moved her chest area up towards my face! That kind of sexual
energy manipulation may have worked well with some of the kind of people
who seemed to be the bulk of her clients; but I tend to be a bit more
objective about things. I did NOT go back! And not just because she
tried to get me to buy a lot of "superior" (warning #2) _private_label_
(warning #3) products...
Whether these things are self deception on the part of the
practitioner, or intentional fraud, is NOT as important TO US as the
fact that this type of activity gives LESS ACCURATE readings. My
personal bias is to go with the doctor who is open, willing to
discuss things, and admits that he or she is not sure. The more
insistent a
doctor's pronouncements, the less I am inclined to trust. That
is, unless he or she can explain working verifiable theories that
make some kind of scientific sense to me. Confidence is not about being
sure, it is about being able to accept ambiguity and being willing to try
to reason around and through it. And being open to new ideas.
Everything we know, was once a new idea. But then, so was everything we
now believe to be false...
An aside here, there is another method used in kinesiology and
homeopathy involving a meter gadget sometimes called a Vega machine.
(It's only a Whetstone Bridge
circuit, fed by an oscilator.) Once again, many practitioners place
their _own_ body into the loop, allowing them to influence the
readings. Even something as simple as changing the pressure they
apply to the electrode can change the readings. It is FAR too easy
to bias these things without the average person realizing it, and
sometimes (often?) without the practitioner realizing that he is
doing it.
Some practitioners even get visibly frustrated when they get
different results! Come on, folks, opinions do not reality
make. If it did, we could holt the opinion that we didn't have
allergies, and maybe could walk on (deep liquid) water.
Without objective protocols and the isolation/insulation in
which only the patient is in the loop, all the fancy equipment in
the world becomes little more than window dressing.
1. Place myself at a quiet rest -- no tv or radio, etc. And no
thinking about musical tunes!
2. I set myself up. Extending my non-dominant arm (the
left arm for most right handed people,) sideways
away from myself with a clenched fist, I bring it up under the edge
of a kitchen cabinet. The fist is thumb side up, so that it may
slide relatively easily, yet the upward pressure will tend to keep
it from sliding. I put my feet together, and lean away from the
cabinet, relying on the upward pressure of my extended arm to keep
from falling. You can find a kind of precarious balance this way,
using the initial degree of lean as a means of adjusting for the baseline
strength of your arm. Do make sure that you won't fall over when the
extended hand stops holding you. (I would just bump in to my refrigerator
if it let go completely.)
You could also use a bottle or pail of water, or a scale to
measure the resistance or force of your muscles. Fill the bottle or
pail till you find it difficult to hold it at arms length. It's the
idea of detecting weakness WITHOUT resorting to another person.
People just are not objective, and may add their own "electrical
resonance" or some other factor to the equation. YOU have to do
this ALONE.
3. I do a "body scan". Using the dominant hand, I pick up a
container of whatever it is which I wish to test. I bring that hand
to the center of my chest, near the thymus gland. Nothing? Next, I
try it against one of my temples. Then I move it to the base of my
skull in back of my head, and slowly bringing it up over my head and
down my face, slowly down my front side, and then sideways and up a
bit till it rests over to my non-dominant side kidney.
If, at any point, the item causes me to lose my strength, I
will feel my fist sliding out from under the counter and myself
leaning into a fall. I stop this by moving my feet apart, etc., and
catching myself. If I have to do that, it probably means there
could be something in the ingredients of the stuff in the container,
that I might react to. I am more reluctant to try it.
4. If it's an edible, is to put a bit of it under my tongue.
If my fist starts slipping...
If you do this often enough, you will come to the point where
just picking up an object will give you a faint sense of whether it
may be harmful to your. (A handy sense to have if someone ever
tries to slip a potion into your drink...)
Aha! You say, but he knows if he is allergic to what he tests!
Well... so what if my subconscious does know? It is telling my
conscious. And there are times where it is rather clear to me that
I should, or should not be allergic, yet the reading goes the other
way. But it is also true that I am a stickler for finding out. I
have never "spooked" and run without first seeing whether I would
react. I also try to find out exactly to what I am reacting. I am
a scientist first, an MCS/EI victim second. There is always a
reason for things, and I try to read up and find our why.
And that's another thing I strongly suggest -- that YOU always
try to figure out WHY and TO WHAT you reacted.
I once developed an allergy to what seemed to be blue cloth on
several items of clothing. The hue was very similar. But an allergy to a
color? Unlikely! Microscopic examination revealed those clothes were all
of the same kind of fibers, with the dye ON, not IN the fibers. All of the
cloths I was allergic to, were shedding microscopic dye particles. Those
few blue cloths I was not allergic to, were not shedding dye particles.
You have to investigate as best you can.
If you look, you have a good chance of finding out precisely
what to avoid. If you don't, you will seem more and more paranoid
in your efforts to avoid everything which might cause allergies,
becoming more and more stressed out from FEAR! You only need to
avoid the specific chemicals that your body is allergic to. Always
try to find out how and why -- your life, and your appearance of
sanity, depends on it!
You can't avoid everything, you don't have that kind of energy.
Learn what to avoid, don't waste your energy avoiding what you don't
need to.
Then there is the matter of metabolites. As we digest and
"burn up" foods, we generate lots of chemicals. I have had strong
reaction to things which, although not reactive upon ingestion, have
_I_BELIEVE_, produced metabolites to which I am allergic. These
produce false readings of safety.
Also, many allergies are variable, not triggering reaction when
we are stronger, only when we are below some threshold. Thus, you
may find it ok to eat some things at one time, but not another.
Note also that you should rotate your diet so that there is no build
up of allergic response to commonly used foods.
And finally, there are the Herxhiemer reactions, caused when
toxic bacteria and/or fungi die, bursting open and releasing all of
their toxins at once. These too, can confuse one, making one think
that one is allergic to some things to which one might not test
positive to. A false false negative, so to speak. The way you
may be able to tell a herxhiemer reaction, is that after it passes,
you feel better than before the reaction occurred. If the
herxhiemer involves the stomach, it may take place within an hour or
three of ingestion. If it's in the lower bowel... days later.
As I said, kinesiology is not highly reliable. I only use it
as a guideline, an indicator of potential trouble. But I do use it.
Even dead muscles will contract a few times in response to
electrical stimulation.
So it is unlikely that it is merely muscle strength
itself. A muscle cell can not remain continuously contracted. The
cells pulse, contracting and relaxing over and over again. Indeed,
most repetitive stress research suggests that when a muscle
contracts, it cuts off circulation to itself, resulting in fatigue,
and soon damage.
So how do weight lifters hold such heavy weights? They
concentrate, getting the brain to order the firing signals to that
there is a continued and even pattern of muscle cell
firing in their
limbs. To work properly, muscles have to contract and relax in a
harmonious overlapping manner. Contrast this to the shaking most
people experience when trying to lift or hold heavy objects. They
have not learned to order and pace the firing of their muscle fibers
to match the load.
Therefore, I suspect that what kinesiology is measuring, is how
much neural activity the brain can muster, and how well it can order
it. This is also suggested by the change in resistance when one
lets a melody play in the mind during the experiment. In most
cases, calming melodies seem to steady and improve _my_ ability to
apply force. The same calming melodies have helped me during other
times as well.
But just because we can't explain it, does not mean that it
does not work. It just means that you will have to be Extra
Objective and Careful to avoid deception and self-deception.
(Just between you and me, I feel _a_LOT_ more comfortable using
technology that I can Understand in terms of basic physical
principles!!! I mean, to me, Kinesiology smacks of examining
chicken entrails... Though I must admit that I do use kinesiology
as an advanced early warning system. For me, it seems to have a
strong, though not perfect, correlation with reality. I just wish I
understood __HOW__ it worked!!)
(Oh yes, you have heard about science not being able to
mathematically explain how a bumble bee can fly. When they added
the viscosity of the air to that mathematical model, it all made
sense. That's because to a tiny bumble bee wing, air atoms are
huge when compared to the ratio of a bird's wing and the atoms it
deals with. Thus to the bee, the air is many times more viscous, almost
like water! That is why the fly's wings differ from a birds, and why a
tiny humming bird's wings are not identical to a larger bird's wing.)
1. The practitioner discourages
you from thinking for yourself, from trying things yourself. That
"I am the Doctor" (and you are an idiot,) kind of attitude.
2. The practitioner moves his point of contact between trials.
3. The practitioner or his staff try to sell you something
"better" and/or "not available in stores". (Then again, sometimes
the stuff is better or is not available...)
Two out of three, and I would walk out.
Though, one must admit that sometimes there are legitimate
personality issues that make
it seem that the doctor is acting like God. My doctor and I get
along very well, and discuss a lot of things! (We've actually run
way past closing, discussing research and computers till we are both
starving!) But I have heard a few other people think he is, at
times, pendantic and perhaps even a bit arrogant. Then again, He
complains that some of his patients don't even TRY to cure
themselves; but spend their session throwing up objections to
treatments, claiming nothing will work, or that they can't try this
or that. He (and others) say those kinds of patients don't want to
be cured. I think it more likely that those patients don't BELIEVE
that they CAN be cured! Probably because they have been run through
the mill by a lot of other doctors without a clue.
If you don't believe a doctor can cure you, why bother going to
that doctor? Find a doctor you can believe in! Even if his
treatments end up not working, at least you TRIED! That's one heck
of a lot better than simply rolling over and waiting to die!
Do you want to get well? Then YOU have to TRY! No one else
can try for you. It's up to YOU! YOU are the one who has to try!
(And if, deep down inside, you don't want to get well...
Somebody up there, or SOMEWHERE, loves you and wants you to get well.
Know that _I_, and most of the rest of us on this list, WANT you to
get well, and get well soon! You might try browsing the religion
list at
www.mall-net.com/hot/relig.html till you find a deity or deities whom
you can believe do believe in you. You will know it when you feel the
connection. It's ok.)
So in a nutshell, this is what I know about kinesiology. Some
of it came from observing various kinesiological "stuff" tried on
me, some from a videotaped lecture, and some from "Allergies and
Candida with the 21st
Century Solution" by Steven Rochlits, Ph.D.C. A curious book that I
am not quite sure I want to list on on the bibliography... But
then, I find that most of the books I read contain a lot of
"inapplicable" stuff, and a few gems here and there. I try things
cautiously. Sometimes the stuff I would swear is bunk, works; and
sometimes the stuff I would swear is scientifically proven, turns
out to be bunk. The really interesting thing for me, is to try to
figure out WHY!
Test Yourself!
What all this suggests, is that you should find some non-personal
means of measuring the resistance your arm or fingers can generate.How I Test Myself
How can YOU test yourself? Here is what I do:Sources of Inaccuracy
What are some of the causes of inaccuracies in my kind of
kinesiology? Wet hands are the worst. Reactivity may from day to
day, and even with the time of day. Some things that I may react to
in the daytime, I may not react to late in the evening. And the arm
can become fatigued during the procedure. All these can produce
false indications of probable allergens. (Some have said this
greater strength at night implies liver involvement. Other suggest
late evening hunger raises adrenal levels, giving the appearance of
resistance. Don't know.) What is Measured
What is kinesiology really measuring? I think it is an
indicator of how well ordered the brain's firing patterns are. A
kind of test of the ability of the lower centers of the brain to
concentrate on coordinating the muscles to handle the task at hand.How Kinesiology Works
Now comes the embarrassing question of HOW kinesiology works,
how a person can sense what is in a sealed container. Quite
frankly, I haven't a clue! Some talk about electron resonances,
others talk about spatial fields or tachyon fields. Wessly Crusher
would probably say is it s "distortion in the sub-space field".
SCIENCE DOES NOT KNOW! Tacheyon fields do not exist. Sub-space
does not exist. At least, not as we know it from science fiction.Are You Being Deceived?
On a more practical level, how can you tell if you are being
deceived?
This document is not to be construed as medical advice.
This draft document may contain inaccuracies and errors.
(C) 1995, MCS@mall-net.com. All rights reserved. Permission to
distribute granted provided this document is not modified, is
distributed in its entirety, with all links attached, and distributed
without charge.
|
Enviro
Illness and Multi-Chem Sensitivity |
|
Chronic Fatigue |
Health |
Other Medical Links |
MCS Page
Allergy Index
For your web space and web photography needs,
contact
webmaster@mall-net.com
Hot Links
Mall-Net